Sharp Logica Tools

Engineering Tools

Engineering Due Diligence Scorecard

This route is focused on technical due-diligence workflows for investors, acquirers, and leadership teams.

Preliminary Technology Risk Assessment. Directional assessment based on assumptions; final conclusions require full technical due diligence.

Risk Score

61/100

Overall Assessment

Proceed with Conditions

Proceed only with clear remediation conditions and execution tracking.

Remediation Cost

$165,800 - $343,800

Remediation Timeline

3-6 months

Architecture

81

Technical Debt

50

Delivery Health

56

Team Risk

63

Security

70

Cloud Efficiency

50

Roadmap Realism

25

Model

Weighted risk model

20/20/15/15/15/10/5

Top Findings

  • -Backup/DR restoration is not validated.
  • -Roadmap realism shows elevated risk (25/100).
  • -Technical debt shows elevated risk (50/100).
  • -Cloud and infrastructure efficiency shows elevated risk (50/100).
  • -Engineering delivery health shows elevated risk (56/100).

Architecture Fitness

Architecture shape, reliability, and recovery profile.

20% Weight

Technical Debt

Maintainability pressure from coverage, bugs, and legacy constraints.

20% Weight

Engineering Delivery Health

Release velocity and change stability indicators.

15% Weight

Team and Key-Person Risk

Team resilience, documentation, and concentration risk.

15% Weight

Security and Compliance

Control posture, testing discipline, and recovery readiness.

15% Weight

Cloud and Infrastructure Efficiency

Spend exposure and platform automation maturity.

10% Weight

Product and Roadmap Realism

Forward feasibility and claim reliability.

5% Weight
Book Architecture Review

About

How It Helps

This calculator gives a structured first-pass view of technical deal risk before deeper architecture, code, and operations review.

It is useful for pre-investment screening, acquisition triage, platform risk framing, and remediation planning when decisions need consistent technical signals.

Outputs are directional. Use them to prioritize follow-up diligence and validate assumptions with full technical review.

Score model: weighted category scoring (20/20/15/15/15/10/5). Higher category scores indicate higher risk in that area.

Architecture Fitness (20%)

Architecture style, incident rate, recovery time (MTTR), and scaling constraints.

Technical Debt (20%)

Release delays, open bug load, and legacy-system burden.

Engineering Delivery Health (15%)

Deployment frequency, lead time, change-failure profile, and hotfix pressure.

Team and Key-Person Risk (15%)

Team size resilience, bus-factor concentration, and documentation maturity.

Security and Compliance (15%)

Vulnerability response, secrets/access controls, and security process maturity.

Cloud and Infra Efficiency (10%)

Cloud-spend risk level plus IaC, observability, and rollback maturity.

Product and Roadmap Realism (5%)

Confidence in roadmap commitments, planning realism, and delivery feasibility.