Sharp Logica Tools

Business Tools

Due Diligence Risk Score Calculator

Run a preliminary technology risk assessment across architecture, security, technical debt, operations, cloud, team risk, and delivery health.

Preliminary Technology Risk Assessment. Directional assessment based on assumptions; final conclusions require full technical due diligence.

Risk Score

61/100

Overall Assessment

Proceed with Conditions

Proceed only with clear remediation conditions and execution tracking.

Remediation Cost

$165,800 - $343,800

Remediation Timeline

3-6 months

Architecture

81

Technical Debt

50

Delivery Health

56

Team Risk

63

Security

70

Cloud Efficiency

50

Roadmap Realism

25

Model

Weighted risk model

20/20/15/15/15/10/5

Top Findings

  • -Backup/DR restoration is not validated.
  • -Roadmap realism shows elevated risk (25/100).
  • -Technical debt shows elevated risk (50/100).
  • -Cloud and infrastructure efficiency shows elevated risk (50/100).
  • -Engineering delivery health shows elevated risk (56/100).

Architecture Fitness

Architecture shape, reliability, and recovery profile.

20% Weight

Technical Debt

Maintainability pressure from coverage, bugs, and legacy constraints.

20% Weight

Engineering Delivery Health

Release velocity and change stability indicators.

15% Weight

Team and Key-Person Risk

Team resilience, documentation, and concentration risk.

15% Weight

Security and Compliance

Control posture, testing discipline, and recovery readiness.

15% Weight

Cloud and Infrastructure Efficiency

Spend exposure and platform automation maturity.

10% Weight

Product and Roadmap Realism

Forward feasibility and claim reliability.

5% Weight
Book Architecture Review

About

How it helps

Technical due diligence often happens under time pressure. Investors, founders, and acquirers need an early view of platform risk before committing weeks of interviews, architecture review, code analysis, and operational assessment. This tool provides a structured first-pass assessment across the areas that most often influence software execution and investment outcomes.

The baseline model evaluates seven categories: architecture fitness, technical debt, engineering delivery health, team and key-person risk, security and compliance, cloud and infrastructure efficiency, and product/roadmap realism. Each category contributes a weighted score using a 20/20/15/15/15/10/5 model aligned to practical diligence risk.

The assessment combines signals such as deployment reliability, operational stability, test coverage, release quality, documentation maturity, security controls, infrastructure practices, and roadmap confidence. The goal is not perfect prediction; it is to surface patterns that deserve deeper investigation.

The score is directional and does not replace full technical due diligence. Real diligence includes architecture review, code inspection, infrastructure analysis, interviews, dependency mapping, and business context that cannot be fully captured in a questionnaire.

Use this assessment to identify concerns early, compare multiple companies consistently, estimate remediation effort, and create a clear starting point for a deeper review. Results include a risk band, recommendation, top findings, and estimated remediation range.

Current output is most useful as an early screening layer. In full diligence, cloud efficiency should also be interpreted relative to revenue (for example infrastructure spend as a percentage of revenue), not only absolute monthly spend.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

+What is a technical due diligence risk score?

It is a directional score that summarizes preliminary technology risk across architecture, technical debt, delivery, team risk, security, cloud, and roadmap factors. It is used for early screening before full diligence.

+Can a calculator replace full technical due diligence?

No. A calculator can highlight likely risk areas, but full diligence requires expert review of architecture, code quality, deployment maturity, security posture, cloud costs, and team dependencies.

+How is the due diligence score weighted?

This model uses: Architecture 20%, Technical Debt 20%, Engineering Delivery 15%, Team Risk 15%, Security 15%, Cloud 10%, and Roadmap Realism 5%.

+What does Proceed with Conditions mean?

It means risk is material but manageable if specific remediation actions are agreed and tracked, such as reducing key-person risk, improving deployment maturity, or tightening security controls.

+Why does bus factor matter in software due diligence?

A low bus factor means too much knowledge is concentrated in one person. This increases execution and continuity risk after investment or acquisition.

+Why are security controls included in technical due diligence?

Missing controls such as MFA, secrets management, tested backups, and current penetration testing can introduce immediate operational and compliance risk.

+How should investors use this score?

Use it as an initial signal for triage and prioritization. High-risk outputs should trigger targeted follow-up questions or a full investor technical due diligence review.

+What related calculators should I use with this one?

Useful follow-ups are Technical Debt Calculator, Team Capacity Calculator, AI ROI Calculator, Architecture Scorecard, and Contractor Rate Calculator.