Sharp Logica Tools

Engineering Tools

Cloud Efficiency Risk Calculator

This route emphasizes security, cloud, and operational reliability risks that often drive diligence outcomes.

Preliminary Technology Risk Assessment. Directional assessment based on assumptions; final conclusions require full technical due diligence.

Risk Score

61/100

Overall Assessment

Proceed with Conditions

Proceed only with clear remediation conditions and execution tracking.

Remediation Cost

$165,800 - $343,800

Remediation Timeline

3-6 months

Architecture

81

Technical Debt

50

Delivery Health

56

Team Risk

63

Security

70

Cloud Efficiency

50

Roadmap Realism

25

Model

Weighted risk model

20/20/15/15/15/10/5

Top Findings

  • -Backup/DR restoration is not validated.
  • -Roadmap realism shows elevated risk (25/100).
  • -Technical debt shows elevated risk (50/100).
  • -Cloud and infrastructure efficiency shows elevated risk (50/100).
  • -Engineering delivery health shows elevated risk (56/100).

Architecture Fitness

Architecture shape, reliability, and recovery profile.

20% Weight

Technical Debt

Maintainability pressure from coverage, bugs, and legacy constraints.

20% Weight

Engineering Delivery Health

Release velocity and change stability indicators.

15% Weight

Team and Key-Person Risk

Team resilience, documentation, and concentration risk.

15% Weight

Security and Compliance

Control posture, testing discipline, and recovery readiness.

15% Weight

Cloud and Infrastructure Efficiency

Spend exposure and platform automation maturity.

10% Weight

Product and Roadmap Realism

Forward feasibility and claim reliability.

5% Weight
Book Architecture Review

About

How It Helps

This calculator gives a structured first-pass view of technical deal risk before deeper architecture, code, and operations review.

It is useful for pre-investment screening, acquisition triage, platform risk framing, and remediation planning when decisions need consistent technical signals.

Outputs are directional. Use them to prioritize follow-up diligence and validate assumptions with full technical review.

Score model: weighted category scoring (20/20/15/15/15/10/5). Higher category scores indicate higher risk in that area.

Architecture Fitness (20%)

Architecture style, incident rate, recovery time (MTTR), and scaling constraints.

Technical Debt (20%)

Release delays, open bug load, and legacy-system burden.

Engineering Delivery Health (15%)

Deployment frequency, lead time, change-failure profile, and hotfix pressure.

Team and Key-Person Risk (15%)

Team size resilience, bus-factor concentration, and documentation maturity.

Security and Compliance (15%)

Vulnerability response, secrets/access controls, and security process maturity.

Cloud and Infra Efficiency (10%)

Cloud-spend risk level plus IaC, observability, and rollback maturity.

Product and Roadmap Realism (5%)

Confidence in roadmap commitments, planning realism, and delivery feasibility.